top of page

Summerville Residents Weigh in on Vape Ban and Penalties in Local Poll



A debate continues among Summerville residents following the first reading of a new ordinance aimed at banning smoking and vaping in town-owned parks, playgrounds, recreational facilities, and at public events. A local poll hosted by Summerville News drew strong opinions, with 53% of voters supporting the ban and 47% opposing it. A total of 221 residents participated in the poll, reflecting the divided sentiment in the community.



At the center of the controversy is the harsh penalty for violations—up to a $500 fine or 30 days in jail. Many commenters took to social media to express their concerns.


Susan Bigham, echoing a common sentiment, commented, "30 days in jail is a bit extreme!!!" Robin Reed suggested a more community-focused approach: "Maybe they could do community service! Shelters need help instead of jail time!"


Others felt that the ban infringes on personal freedoms. Eric Crook remarked, "What happened to a free country? I haven't smoked a cigarette in 5 years, FYI, leave people alone!" This perspective was shared by Brit Mahoney, who added, "Freedom of choice. In restaurants, they used to have smoking and non-smoking choices. So have an area for it, but don’t ban."


Another focal point of concern was how the ban would be enforced in outdoor areas and at public events. Kelly Johnson criticized the blanket ban, stating, "A $500 fine and the possibility of 30 days in jail is absolutely absurd. I could see people doing it on accident and not knowing the boundaries."


Many commenters suggested designated smoking areas as a reasonable compromise, rather than an outright ban. Trae Dantzler agreed, calling a designated area "reasonable" but labeling the ban itself as "ridiculous."


Despite the opposition, some residents fully supported the ban, particularly in enclosed or crowded spaces. Mary Singletary voiced her frustration with public smoking: "I do not appreciate when people blow it in your face. I do not choose to smoke any type of material and I should not have it blown in my face by someone that makes that choice."


However, even some supporters of the ban felt the proposed penalties were excessive. Peter Gorman commented, "The penalty far exceeds the crime… the first year of enforcement should include simply warning citations."


As Summerville Town Council prepares for the second reading of the ordinance, it’s clear that public opinion is sharply divided. The feedback from the community will likely play a crucial role in shaping the final version of the ordinance, especially regarding the severity of the penalties.


With the town's next council meeting approaching, the vaping and smoking ban will continue to be a topic of debate in Summerville. Residents are encouraged to attend the meeting or submit their opinions as the town moves closer to a final decision.


48 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page